Sunday, June 5, 2016
TEDx talk
Here's the TEDx talk I gave, Living Smaller in a Warmer World. I implied that old snowmachines were okay, in certain circumstances. I take it back. They're filthy polluters.
Thursday, March 10, 2016
my new used car
I gave a TEDx talk a few weeks ago, about the joys and
merits of living smaller. As with many projects, it was down to the last
minute, with so much practicing in the last few days that I started to lose my
voice. Ideas that I’d been considering for years I finally had to nail down. Combined with reading two influential books – one a
philosophical and ethical exploration of climate change that I happened to see
on a library shelf, the other a book Ian gave me estimating the carbon
footprint of everything – the process of thinking and writing led me to
conclusions I hadn’t had before. Most of them validated choices I’d made already,
but some challenged them, at least to the point that those choices will require
work to justify.
Not surprisingly, my thinking continued after the deadline
passed, and there are things I would say differently now. For one, I implied
that snowmachines were somehow okay, if we didn’t ride them too much and if
using one kept us from flying to Hawaii for vacation. Now I think
snowmachines are terrible polluters (of greenhouse gases and other noxious things) that are hard to justify for any reason. And after a phase of being critical of
every new thing, convinced that we should all shop only at second-hand stores,
I don’t see it as quite evil to buy a new softshell jacket.
More generally, in emphasizing the under-recognized problem
of consumption itself, I suggested we should make do with what we have, even if
it’s an old truck. Part of my thinking came from one of those books, How Bad
are Bananas?, in which the author is fairly critical of rooftop solar, not
because it doesn’t reduce emissions over its life, but because there are much
cheaper ways to reduce emissions. (In a sense, changing our behavior is the
cheapest way to reduce emissions, and probably the most effective.) I think the
idea resonated for me because it challenged the notion that we can buy our way
out, that we can continue to live as we do, just with new technology. And it’s
true that a lot of energy and resources go into making new things, including energy-efficient
things.
But now I think we need both. We need to change how we live. But if we want to live anything like how we live now, we need to be using the
most efficient things, too.
As I was preparing my talk, I found out the head gasket was
leaking on my 20-year-old Tacoma. A year ago, I might have been excited to look
for a new truck, but now I considered getting a new engine to keep the old one
running. I looked for another old truck, even an old F-150, because honestly
the Tacoma is not much better on gas. Then I saw a Prius for sale on Craigslist
and knew I wanted it.
In a way it’s an experiment. I like living in a way that
seems to warrant a truck – hauling firewood, filling the back with coolers for
Chitina. This will be a test to see what I can and can’t do with a 2-wheel
drive hatchback. For now it seems like I have a ton of space compared to the truck.
I’ve heard the Priuses don’t do great at 30 below, that the
small battery tends to die. But there’s a way around the battery problem. With good tires, traction has been fine. I was warned the small engine
(1.5 liters) isn’t great at heating the cab, but that seems like a small
inconvenience when the goal is getting around without destroying the planet.
My 10-year-old Prius could not be more different from an old
F-150. It has automatic windows and locks, a button instead of a key, a touchscreen
and backup camera – and a backup beeper, because it is often silent. It still
has a gas engine, but the dashboard doesn’t show engine temp and doesn’t have a
tachometer, as if Toyota has said, We’ve got this. Indeed, the mechanic where I
took my Tacoma said he’s never seen an engine fail on a Prius.
But in a sense the Prius makes you more aware of burning
gas, and of the fact that it takes energy to go somewhere. The display
shows you when you are moving in a way the battery can handle and when you need
the power of the engine. And it tracks average fuel economy over time, in
five-minute chunks and continually. As with riding a bike or running, it’s easy
to see that it takes more energy to go fast or to go uphill. I can even
imagine driving a less hilly route to save energy.
I’d heard of hypermilers, and now I understand the appeal.
There’s a big downhill on my drive into town. Now I watch the display to see
when my average MPG will click up a tenth of a mile. I think, when the five-minute
average is 75 miles per gallon, Man, that was a good five minutes. I got an app
the previous owner had recommended to track my fuel economy in different
seasons.
After 277 miles, it looked like I needed gas. I’d been
watching the average mileage all week, but somehow still couldn’t believe it
when the pump clicked off at 7.5 gallons. And the mileage should get
considerably better in the summer.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
homage to the pigs
When it came time this weekend for a toast – after I’d shot
the pigs, after we’d scrubbed them, hung them, and skinned them, and after
Alex, who had jumped into the pen to sever the jugular veins, poured us all
generous shots of whiskey – all I could manage was, We had a lot of good times together.
How do you capture a whole life in a few words? We held our
glasses.
And we’ll have many
more good times together, Matt said. And he was right. The whole point of
raising pigs was to have the meat. Or at least it had always been my plan to
turn them into meat. So what if I’d loved pigs since childhood? So what if I’d
come to love these pigs in particular? We drank.
They loved milk,
Kate said. A few weeks before, I’d proposed that if Lily and Porkchop had a
headstone, that would be their epitaph. But it didn’t seem funny now.
My sister, who knew my love of pigs, had warned me that it
might be hard to kill them, even that my desire to have them, my pleasure in caring
for them, might be a misplaced desire for children. But killing them wasn’t particularly
hard. I’d spent time with them alone the night before, and again the morning
of. By the time friends arrived to help, there was a job to do, and I probably
didn’t afford myself the opportunity to be sad.
For a few weeks, when people asked I’d said I wanted to eat
Porkchop, a castrated male, and sell Lily to someone who would breed her. (It
seemed he would provide plenty of meat.) But when I decided, somewhat suddenly
last week, to visit my mother across the country, I had no leads on a buyer.
Kate asked at Silver Gulch, where a waitress she knew raised
pigs. The woman wasn’t there, but we sat at the bar and showed pictures of Lily
to the bartender and a man at the bar who had raised pigs. (It had been our
experience that about half the people we mentioned pigs to either had pigs or
had raised them as children: the cook at Meals on Wheels, the foreman on Kate’s
job, the sales clerk at AIH, my supervisor.) With the bartender, we joked about
Lily living out her life as the restaurant’s mascot, eating spent brewing
grains and scraps from the kitchen.
A day later, Kate got a nibble, but then the man never
called back.
Two days before we planned to slaughter Porkchop, I posted
an ad on Craigslist for a “well behaved, well cared for Russian/Duroc/Yorkshire
gilt.” Comes with 150 pounds of pig food.
I was excited for Lily to have another life, and I liked imagining the
possibility of someday raising her piglets. But when I thought of her in a
muddy lot, bullied by bigger pigs, I realized I didn’t wish for her what I
might for myself – an interesting
life. I wanted her life to be all fresh straw, apple slices, and milk. No one
responded to the ad, and maybe it’s just as well. She and Porkchop had never
been apart, and I wasn’t sure how she’d do without him.
I had not weighed the pigs in months, but was able to
estimate their weight using a formula I’d found online (girth squared, times
length, divided by 400). I figured Porkchop weighed a little over 200 pounds
and Lily about 160. Porkchop had reached standard market weight in four and a
half months, ahead of the six months I’d expected from my pig book.
Both of them grew quickly, tripling their weight in the
first month we had them. When Kate and I brought them back in May from a farm
across Cook Inlet from Anchorage, they lived first, quite comfortably, in a
third of my small woodshed. I remember how little they looked when I transferred
them – carrying both at once – to the pig patio.
But Porkchop especially seemed to grow at an unbelievable
rate. Every few days I would look again and think, Really? You’re that big? When they were a few months old, I started
giving them ground barley – the locally grown and cheapest feed – which I would
sometimes mix into a slop with milk, water, and a high-protein concentrate.
Even if they’d been eating all day (I free fed them the whole time), they could
eat ten pounds of mush in a few minutes. They could drink a half-gallon of milk
in maybe 30 seconds. For the last few weeks, it seemed I was opening a new
50-pound bag of feed every few days.
As Porkchop got bigger, he took longer to stand up, and
sometimes he ate sitting down, which suggested a certain laziness. But they
were also solid and strong. I remember at the farm how a piglet of 20 pounds
had pushed me up from a squatting position. I could push Lily and Porkchop and
they wouldn’t move, slap them and they wouldn’t flinch. I scratched their backs
as forcefully as I could. Porkchop looked like he could play football. Lily,
for a while, looked like a ballerina, her full weight balanced on four tiny
hooves.
Recently they’d started to seem grown up. They no longer
chased each other around the pen, sliding across the floorboards or jumping the
water bowl.
Do pigs ever get sick?
my German Couchsurfer asked one evening last week. I said they hadn’t, and
wondered at it myself. I’ve never been able to keep a plant alive, and here
were these guys, walking around in their own waste, in full health. When Kate
and I brought them home – in a borrowed dog crate under a borrowed topper – I’d
stopped often to check on them. We gave them goat milk from baby bottles and
adjusted the windows for what we guessed was the right temperature for
month-old pigs. Since then, I’d merely kept them fed and watered and mucked the
pen as much as I could stand.
But the night Judith asked, I noticed Porkchop was limping.
He wasn’t using his front right hoof at all. An infection? A splinter? By then
I knew I’d have to slaughter him soon, so there was no question of hiring a
vet. The next day, I washed his foot while Kate passed stalks of kale through
the fence. The swelling and lack of tenderness made me think he’d just sprained
his ankle, climbing onto the feeder for an apple or slipping on the wet floor.
He could still get around, but he couldn’t shove Lily away from the feeder, and
he generally seemed humbled. Lily had started out as the bully, making up for
her smaller size with aggressiveness and smarts. But as Porkchop got bigger, he
pushed and blocked his way to the lion’s share of food. We thought he was kind
of a jerk. Now, with his handicap, we felt a tenderness toward him.
They weren’t pets. They never approved of the harness that would have allowed walks. And if they knew their names, they didn’t respond to them. But they let me scratch them, and they usually came to us when we were there, either to say hello or because we often gave them food. When I cleaned the pen, Lily would tip over my bucket and shovel, stick her head between my legs. When I screwed boards around their sleeping area (to keep the straw in place), Porkchop took the end of the tape measure in his mouth. Lily tugged on my t-shirt.
They weren’t pets. They never approved of the harness that would have allowed walks. And if they knew their names, they didn’t respond to them. But they let me scratch them, and they usually came to us when we were there, either to say hello or because we often gave them food. When I cleaned the pen, Lily would tip over my bucket and shovel, stick her head between my legs. When I screwed boards around their sleeping area (to keep the straw in place), Porkchop took the end of the tape measure in his mouth. Lily tugged on my t-shirt.
They loved shoelaces, and spent hours chewing on a length of
rope I tied in their pen. They liked chewing on the teeter-totter I made them. They
loved the cheap swimming pool I got them – until I spooked Porkchop and he
crushed it.
A few days ago, Mark and Annmarie brought their daughter to
meet the pigs. I sliced an apple, a pluot, and a banana and tore off some chunks
of baguette. Claire, who is one and a half, seemed scared at first, and didn’t
want to feed them or even get close to the wire fence. Pig, she said. Mark and I fed them milk from baby bottles and stuck
a few slices of apple through the fence. Eat,
Claire said. She was smiling now.
I mixed the rest of the fruit and bread into a mushy bowl of
barley and dropped the bowl into the pen. The pigs dug into the food, pushing
each other out of the way with their snouts. Claire said, Pig eat, which was about all she could say and about all that
needed to be said.
Like all of us, Claire had learned that pigs say oink. But I’m not sure I ever heard Lily
and Porkchop oink. When we carried them by a hind leg from the pen at the farm,
they squealed. And Porkchop squealed later, whenever I weighed him (I used a
bathroom scale until they reached 60 pounds). They also whined, if they saw me through
the fence pouring some milk, or if the fighting for food seemed unfair to one. But
mostly they made a little grunt – what I suppose is the oink – that seemed to say,
You there? Uh huh. When they were
very little, the call and response was almost constant. You there? Uh huh. Later, it came and went. They were quite vocal
the few times we let one pig out of the pen. When Lily was free, Porkchop
whined for himself and grunted, we thought, out of concern for her. Where are you? Right here. Lily explored
as far as the outhouse and the bottom of the driveway (digging holes in the
packed rock), but when Porkchop called her back, she came at a sprint that
reminded me of the pot-bellied pig races I’d seen as a kid at the fair. When Porkchop
started frothing at the mouth, we put Lily back in the pen.
The one time I let Porkchop out, he seemed to have no
concern for Lily and no sense that his good behavior might allow future forays.
He stayed out as long as he could (tearing up chunks of wet moss), and might
have slept under the pen all week if I hadn’t shooed him out. I trapped him in
the dog crate, but when I tried to lift it, he jumped free. Kate came over to
help. I built an enclosed ramp with pallets and plywood. A little after
midnight, Porkchop ran right up the ramp and into the pen, skipping the trail
of Cheerios.
I had made them a raised pen because I knew that any amount
of black spruce forest I gave them would turn into a mud pit. But they liked
being outside so much that I fenced in a small area of forest next to the pen.
When I let them out, they raced between the skinny trees and rooted in the
ground. Lily started digging along the fence line, and then Porkchop, and by
the time I caught them, they were probably five minutes from breaking out. I
reinforced the fence. Maybe a week later, I came home to find a good-sized tree
leaning against the roof of the patio, literally uprooted by their rooting. One
by one, they brought down the rest of the trees. My sister joked that I should
start a land clearing and stump removal business. When the outdoor pen became a
squishy mess of mud and poop, I locked the door.
It felt lonely coming home the day after the slaughter. I’d
had a habit, for months now, of getting out of the truck and asking, Are they any pigs here? Because the road
side of the pen was plywood, I could often hear them before I could see them.
They would grunt, Uh huh, and come greet
me, Lily putting my fingers in her mouth as if to nurse, and Porkchop, always
more wary, allowing a wet fist bump with his snout.
After we’d hauled the meat to the butcher, my hands still
red with blood, I’d come home and torn apart the pen, I guess to remove the
reminder. For months I’d enjoyed watching them settle into their sleeping
corner, or catching them having a midnight snack if I stepped out to pee. I saw
them yawn and sneeze, dream and pass gas. Sometimes Kate and I would stand on
the ladder to the loft and watch them out the window. No matter how
aggressively they’d fought over the milk or kale, they always slept side by side,
often with heads or hooves intertwined. Lily was always a light sleeper. Now
each time I stepped outside, I looked reflexively over to where they’d been. I
thought how much they would have liked a soft banana or some sliced white bread
or the last bit of milk. It might have been misplaced sadness over a dying
parent.
On the pigs’ last night, it frosted hard, the first of the
season. They didn’t seem to mind the cold, but were slower to get up than when
the days were longer and warmer. I sliced a peach and brought it to them.
Porkchop didn’t get up at first, so I fed him where he lay in the straw.
It had been a pleasure to watch them eat – to see how much
they wanted the food and how much they enjoyed eating it. I gave them wild
rhubarb from my lot and bruised fruit and cheap milk from the supermarket. Kate
brought Swiss chard, kale, and kohlrabi greens from her garden. We gave them watermelon,
cantaloupe, and jelly-filled cake. The noise of them chewing, mouths wide open,
always made me smile.
Porkchop got up eventually, but by then I had run out of
peach. Both pigs came to me and buried their snouts in my chest until they
would have pushed me over. I scratched their backs and tugged on their ears,
then went inside to make tapioca pudding. I hope their last thought was that
this time I remembered to add the vanilla.
Monday, August 18, 2014
ballot measure 1
I spent most of yesterday trying to write a foolproof essay
explaining why I planned to vote Yes on Ballot Measure 1 and why everyone
who cares about Alaska should, too. I thought it was pretty clear that Parnell
had traded tax revenues for jobs, and that claims of increasing production
enough to make up for the lower tax rate were unrealistic. I thought the direct
interest of the oil companies and support industries – the truckers and
pipefitters and pilots – had created a lopsided debate between a vocal minority
who depend directly on a lively North Slope and a quieter majority of Alaskans who
depend on the state’s financial health, but less directly. I thought if you
found the necessary facts and considered the relevant arguments, there would be
a right answer.
Then, as I wrote and read, I realized how much I still didn’t
know. I was in Juneau covering politics when Parnell offered his first two tax
proposals, but I wasn’t there for SB 21. I didn’t know the revenue projections,
or the increase in production needed for the state to break even. I didn’t know
the relative importance of oilfield jobs compared to all the teachers, firemen,
and biologists the state employs. I read ads claiming oil production is no
longer dropping, and that revenues are as high as they would have been under
ACES. I learned that sharp people whose commitment to Alaska I never questioned
were voting no.
I had thought the right question to ask was Which tax policy will bring the greatest
revenue to the state in the long run? with some consideration given to the
economic value of a busy oilfield and to legitimate political differences favoring
private industry or government spending. But now I wasn’t sure I knew the
answer, or even if the question could be answered. And if it couldn’t be, then
on what basis should one cast a vote? It’s
our oil?
I think a thorough approach to figuring out which tax is
best for Alaska would include a solid understanding of ACES, SB 21, and the
interplay of taxes and credits in each; Department of Revenue modeling combined with unbiased expert analysis; an
understanding of tax systems, government take, and geologic and political risk in
other oil-producing regions; expert projections for oil prices and
production costs; and an understanding of Alaska’s oilfields (composition,
decline rates) and where they fit in the portfolios of the big three oil
companies and of the smaller companies new to Alaska. I doubt if many Alaskans
will cast truly informed votes tomorrow, and I’m not sure many lawmakers did
when they voted on SB 21. For Alaska’s
future?
I know Palin and Parnell's tax plans both include various tax credits, and that Palin's credits did more to force companies to reinvest in Alaska. I know Parnell's tax generates relatively more revenue at low oil prices and Palin's at high prices. I know production costs are an important wildcard, and that high costs reduce the difference between the two taxes. But there's much more I don't know.
Today I thought maybe people would vote based on whom they
trust – a business group or union, a political party – and that maybe that’s
not a bad thing. That maybe this vote is largely symbolic, not about tax rates
and credits but about the state’s relationship to the oil industry. Palin stood
up to the oil companies, on the gasline and on taxes. She argued – correctly,
in my opinion – that the interests of the oil companies were not the same as
those of the state, and she instituted policies that aimed to be enticing to
companies but which put Alaska’s interests first. It’s remarkable to me that
Parnell and many others seem to think what’s good for Exxon, BP and Conoco is
good for Alaska, and, beyond that, trust the companies to tell us what they
need. Palin had smart, honest people in her Revenue Department, and she brought
in experts who were professional and inspired confidence. Parnell, at least in
his first two tries, offered sound bites. I remember being shocked at how
little homework he seemed to have done in setting tax policy worth billions. It
was as if the companies had told him taxes were too high and he had taken their word
for it.
Whether the numbers work out this way or not, tomorrow’s
vote seems to be between those who believe private industry does and should
drive the state and those who want to get the most from a limited resource.
Between those who won’t lose sleep if oilfield jobs come at the expense of
state budgets and those already suffering from budget cuts.
In a sense, a No vote would say Alaskans trust the industry
enough to negotiate a tax plan together – in my opinion, to let the industry
tell us what’s right for them and for Alaska. A Yes vote will send the message
that Alaskans take the industry seriously, and value it, but won’t be bullied
by it.
And I think that matters. This might sound conspiratorial,
but I imagine oil companies don't base their investment decisions strictly on net present value – or rather, that they're fully aware of a tax policy’s potential to change.
I wouldn’t be surprised if companies here delayed projects when Parnell took office,
or when he declared the taxes too high – if lease requirements are as lax as
they seem, why wouldn’t they wait? I wouldn’t be surprised if they fast-tracked
projects when lawmakers passed a tax policy they liked. And I won’t be
surprised if they punish Alaska for passing Ballot Measure 1. Alaska might lose
money. Who really knows? But in the long run, I think it’s important to show
that Alaska can and will look out for itself.
Before the Legislature passed SB 21, even supporters of ACES
thought it needed some changes, and from what I’ve read, it probably does. I’m
voting Yes for Palin’s tax, but also for the way she put Alaska first and took
tax policy as seriously as it deserves.
Saturday, May 31, 2014
pigs
I got some pigs a few weeks ago. I got the idea when Ian said he wanted a dairy goat, but really I've loved pigs for as long as I can remember, and this just seemed like a reasonable time to have some. I'd heard of people raising pigs over the summer -- feeder pigs -- and butchering them in the fall. Delta barley is pretty cheap, and if you've got a connection to a restaurant or food bank, you can supplement with people food. I got a book on raising pigs, in which I learned that pigs put on weight faster than any other livestock except poultry, and that they have a high meat-body weight ratio (60-70 percent can be used in some way). I learned the correct terms for pigs: a pig is a very young swine, a shoat is from weaning to 125 pounds, and a hog is anything bigger than that. And I learned that pigs can be raised in a dry pen. I'd pretty much made up my mind to get some pigs, but had worried they'd turn any bit of black spruce forest I gave them into a mudpit. A dry pen for two pigs could easily fit on my gravel pad, as long as I could put up with any potential smell.
I asked at feed stores, checked bulletin boards, and looked on Craigslist. It turned out there was a shortage of pigs, apparently because of a disease that had made its way through herds in the Lower 48. I got on a waiting list for some Gloucester Old Spot pigs, a heritage breed that still had strong rooting instinct. I called about some other pigs, Yorkshires being shipped up from the Lower 48. They looked healthy in the photos on Craigslist, but they were a boring breed -- the classic pink pig, raised to be docile in confinement. When all my options seemed exhausted, I found an ad for some mixed bread piglets (a layman's term) down in Point MacKenzie, outside Wasilla. The boar was a Russian/Duroc mix, and one of the sows was Duroc/Yorkshire. Duroc and Russian, I'd read, were both hearty breeds that did well outside. And the piglets were cute, cinnamon-colored with black spots. They were selling them at a younger age (and smaller weight) than other breeders, but I didn't have many options, and if I could keep them healthy, it seemed a plus to get them when they were still small, and maybe even trainable. I'd read The Good Good Pig, which probably gave me a distorted sense of pig intelligence -- even pig wisdom! -- and of pig-human interactions. I'd heard about how smart pigs are, although this was usually in the context of escaping their pens.
I built them a pen without doors, and went to pick them up a few weeks ago. Inside a makeshift shelter, piglets from three litters slept in a giant pig pile in the sun. I chose a gilt (a young female) and a barrow (a castrated male) from the spotted sow. A brother and sister. I got to see their dam and sire, and struggled to imagine them ever growing to that size. After some initial squealing, they seemed happy in a borrowed dog crate on the drive home, and they seem happy now in their new pen. They really shove each other at the food and water bowls, and climb over each other for milk, but they don't seem to fight, and they always sleep side by side. They chase each other around, nap, and eat like pigs. Although it's difficult to weigh them, they seem to be gaining about a pound a day.
I asked at feed stores, checked bulletin boards, and looked on Craigslist. It turned out there was a shortage of pigs, apparently because of a disease that had made its way through herds in the Lower 48. I got on a waiting list for some Gloucester Old Spot pigs, a heritage breed that still had strong rooting instinct. I called about some other pigs, Yorkshires being shipped up from the Lower 48. They looked healthy in the photos on Craigslist, but they were a boring breed -- the classic pink pig, raised to be docile in confinement. When all my options seemed exhausted, I found an ad for some mixed bread piglets (a layman's term) down in Point MacKenzie, outside Wasilla. The boar was a Russian/Duroc mix, and one of the sows was Duroc/Yorkshire. Duroc and Russian, I'd read, were both hearty breeds that did well outside. And the piglets were cute, cinnamon-colored with black spots. They were selling them at a younger age (and smaller weight) than other breeders, but I didn't have many options, and if I could keep them healthy, it seemed a plus to get them when they were still small, and maybe even trainable. I'd read The Good Good Pig, which probably gave me a distorted sense of pig intelligence -- even pig wisdom! -- and of pig-human interactions. I'd heard about how smart pigs are, although this was usually in the context of escaping their pens.
I built them a pen without doors, and went to pick them up a few weeks ago. Inside a makeshift shelter, piglets from three litters slept in a giant pig pile in the sun. I chose a gilt (a young female) and a barrow (a castrated male) from the spotted sow. A brother and sister. I got to see their dam and sire, and struggled to imagine them ever growing to that size. After some initial squealing, they seemed happy in a borrowed dog crate on the drive home, and they seem happy now in their new pen. They really shove each other at the food and water bowls, and climb over each other for milk, but they don't seem to fight, and they always sleep side by side. They chase each other around, nap, and eat like pigs. Although it's difficult to weigh them, they seem to be gaining about a pound a day.
Monday, May 5, 2014
Friday, April 18, 2014
newspapering
Saturday, April 5, 2014
chicken coop
Several months ago, I did a write-up of our chicken coop for the Housing section of a popular poultry magazine. It appears now it's not going to run, so here in full is my submission.
Ian Herriott and Stefan Milkowski built this timber-framed,
passive solar chicken coop in Fairbanks, Alaska. Rocks retain heat from the sun
to warm the coop at night. (Photo by Trystan Herriott)
Ian shaves a floor joist to fit. It was a long winter, with
snow into May.
Stefan and a friend lock the final piece into the frame. We
used local white spruce timbers. (Photo by Ian Herriott)
For siding, we used rough-cut 1x8 boards with a shiplap to
ensure coverage after shrinking.
To help keep the coop warm in the shoulder seasons, we
sealed 750 pounds of rocks behind greenhouse panels. The rocks are heated by
the sun during the day and release heat into the coop at night.
The chicken door and people door have the same R7.5 foam
insulation as the walls.
The red heat lamp turned the coop into a spaceship at night.
We moved the chickens in at the beginning of October, just
as it started to get cold.
Beethoven, our Polish crested, was the first chicken down
the ramp.
The chickens found plenty to pick at in their new home.
An energy-efficient coop built for Alaska
By Stefan Milkowski
Chickens in the arctic?
Sure! Winter temperatures in Fairbanks, Alaska regularly
drop to -40 degrees Fahrenheit, and it can snow from September to May. But
every spring, the local feed store is alive with the chirping of chicks, and
quite a few people successfully raise meat birds and layers, ducks, geese, and
turkeys.
After wanting chickens for years, my friend and neighbor Ian
and I decided to go for it this spring. We got a motley mix of Black Langshams,
red sex links, a Buff Orpington, a White Brahma, an Australorp, a Silkie, a
Polish crested, a bantam, and two ducks. We raised the chicks inside and then
moved them to an uninsulated shed for the summer. We knew the big challenge
would be to keep the chickens warm in the winter – and productive – without
spending too much money on heat and light. Fairbanks is only 200 miles south of
the Arctic Circle, and Ian and I live on the north side of a hill that doesn’t
get any direct sunlight for a few months each winter.
We both built our own cabins and I was doing weatherization
work for a local non-profit, so we had lots of ideas for building an
energy-efficient coop. I wanted to try something I’d seen on a farm near
Portland, Maine – a passive solar collector using greenhouse panels and a big pile
of rocks. The hope was that the rocks would collect heat from the sun during
the day and release it into the coop at night, reducing the need for a heat
lamp during the shoulder seasons.
We knew people who had pieced together coops with salvaged
materials. But I was excited to try out new building techniques and Ian wanted
something with curb appeal in front of his cabin, so we went all out.
We framed the floor and walls with local white spruce
timbers, cutting mortise and tenon joints and pinning them together with (non-local)
oak pegs. We assembled the floor – six by eight feet for the coop, two by eight
for the rock pile – in April, when snow still covered the ground. Over the next
several months, we cut and assembled the rest of the frame, sheathed the frame
with plywood, installed rigid foam insulation (R7.5 on the walls, R10 on the
ceiling and floor), and built insulated doors with thick weatherstripping. For
siding, we ordered rough-cut 1x8s from the local sawmill and then cut deep shiplaps
on the table saw so the boards would still overlap after shrinking. We painted
the coop with a traditional barn red paint made from boiled linseed oil,
turpentine, and red iron oxide.
We separated the rock pile from the main coop with an
insulated wall and cut four vents to allow air circulation. We gathered rocks
from a pile of mine tailings in the valley below us, their tops stained red, coincidentally,
by iron oxide. The farmer in Maine used 10 cubic yards of rocks to heat his shop.
We added rocks until the pile looked about right – 750 pounds in all – and then
sealed the rocks behind greenhouse panels. The panels face due south.
As with any Alaskan building project, we ended up racing the
weather. We screwed down the metal roofing on an evening when cold air rolled
down the hill with the setting sun. It snowed in mid-September, just four
months after the last snow in May.
I’d learned from my weatherization work to “build tight and ventilate
right,” and we’d sealed the coop tight from floor to ceiling with silicone and
spray foam. For ventilation, we cut vents on opposite sides of the coop and
installed an in-line duct fan to blow air out. We put a 60-watt equivalent LED bulb
on a timer to keep the birds laying as the days got shorter and connected a 250-watt
heat lamp to a thermostat. When we tested the red heat lamp one evening, the
greenhouse panels glowed like a spaceship. I knew we’d done something right
when on a 60-degree fall day, the temperature in the rock pile hit 86 degrees.
We moved the birds in at the start of October. We’d picked
up three more layers from friends, bringing our total flock to 14 – a dozen
hens and a pair of roosters named Betsy and Celeste. A few days later, a hawk
landed in a tree across the street and eyed the flock, reminding us to put a
top over our pen. A nighttime raid a few weeks later on our outdoor duck pen forced
us to harvest one of the ducks early.
The chickens adjusted quickly to their new home, and within
a few weeks, production was as good as one could expect from the breeds.
Despite several frosty nights, the heat lamp has yet to come on.
Postscript: Winter came, and we used the heat lamp a lot. The main challenge proved to be keeping the humidity down at relatively low indoor temperatures with all the chicken respiration. We ran the fan quite a bit. Now, with long sunny days in the 30s and below-freezing nights, the coop again seems to be working. We hardly need the lamp at all.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
white mountains 100
When I asked a friend yesterday about his race, he said 60
percent was enjoyable, 20 percent tolerable, and 20 percent suffering. That’s
about how mine was. There was a time, around mile 80, after some hot ramen, a
slab of bread and butter, and a bowl of coffee, that I thought I could say it
was all great except miles 50 to 80. But then I didn’t drink enough, felt
feverish in the cold, and nearly crawled up the big hill at mile 93. So maybe
it was 60-40.
In short, I finished. I walked 100 miles in a little under
33 hours, missing my reach goal but hitting my main goal. I’d worried about my
ankles in the snow, but all my joints held up fine. The blisters, chaffing, and
swelling in my feet seem to be healing.
I’d chosen to walk – rather than bike or ski – for the pure
athletic challenge. I don’t mean to say riding or skiing 100 miles is easy,
just that, relatively speaking, the challenge probably would have shifted toward how fast I could do it rather than if I could do it. My longest training
walk had been 35 miles; my longest single day on foot – in the Sluice Box last summer – was 52 miles. Now I’ve gone almost twice that in one push, if not
quite in one day.
(It was humbling to be among real runners, for whom the
challenge, even on foot, was speed. One racer, a pro from Colorado, ran the
course in 17 hours – beating the course record by 12 hours. My friend Dan,
doing his first hundred-miler, finished in under 24.)
Maybe the most interesting part, looking back, is figuring
out what a body needs to go 100 miles. The simple things, like socks that don’t
cause blisters, are probably easy to figure out. But even veteran racers seemed
to have problems with food. One guy who finished well ahead of me threw up a
bunch. Dan, toward the end, couldn’t digest any of the food he’d brought. In my
case, I think I drank too little and ate too much. For many hours my stomach
felt awful. After about 18 hours, I had no interest in energy bars. By mile 70,
all I wanted was a piece of bread. The pepperoni at mile 82 looked great; cheese had little appeal. Later I craved fresh fruit.
Aside from my feet, I basically felt great the first 45
miles. I was on pace to finish in 25 hours. Then, with night coming as I
neared the high point of the course, I stopped to put on a jacket and got
dangerously chilled. I’d planned to cruise through the checkpoint at mile 62,
but stopped instead and tried to sleep – till 2, then 2:30, then 3. When I
finally left, and for miles down the trail, I wore more clothes than normal for
the temperature. Fatigue? Dehydration? I didn’t know.
Before the race, my sister had told me to remember that how
I felt would probably be like that joke about the weather in Colorado – Don’t
like it? Wait 15 minutes. It wasn’t until I’d felt crappy, then good again,
that I remembered her advice.
After the last checkpoint, the sun came out and I felt
great. I even ran some downhills, imagining matching my friend Trystan’s time
from a few years before. Then I ran out of water and felt terrible again, out
of whack. Guys on snowmachines passed in big parkas. I wasn’t even wearing a
shirt. I started eating snow. My imagined finish time slipped a half hour, then
an hour, then more.
I got some water and felt better. On the last few miles, I
wondered if I could go a mile further than 100. Maybe, but I sure didn’t want
to. Then I heard there was another racer close behind me, gaining fast, so I
started running.
Full results are here. Congrats to all the bikers, skiers, and runners!
cartoons
One of the things I listened to on my phone while walking
through the White Mountains this weekend was a Fresh Air interview with the New
Yorker cartoon editor. They talked about shifting tolerance at the magazine for
racy cartoons, about where to draw the line on offensive jokes (don’t knowingly
offend), and about what makes cartoons funny. In the old days, cartoons were
more often jokes with the characters unwitting subjects; now characters
usually deliver the punch line. Cartoons range from the literal, easy to
understand, to the absurd, where there might not be much to understand. They
usually poke fun at the class of people likely to read The New Yorker.
At least that’s what I remember. The editor didn’t talk much
about making cartoons, except to say that his most famous – in which a suited
exec says into a phone, “No, Thursday’s out. How about never – is never good
for you?” – came mostly from an exchange he’d had himself. Of creating from
whole cloth or drawing from life, the latter seems the easier to me.
Many years ago, my sister, I think inspired by Roz Chast,
tried to draw a few cartoons. I remember one in a deli, and one showing several
different options for wrapping a California-style burrito. I thought they were
pretty funny. In the interview, the editor mentioned a Seinfeld episode in
which Elaine, frustrated at a New Yorker cartoon she couldn’t understand, tries to
write one herself – something about a pig at a complaints department
complaining he feels fat. The editor explained it wasn’t technically a joke,
although I didn’t understand why.
Anyway, here’s my attempt.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
